H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 1-0
Laura Dupont holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1979 Toronto quarterfinal 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1979 | Toronto | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Laura Dupont | 6-2 7-6 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |