H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laura Dupont vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 1-0

Laura Dupont holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1979 Canadian Open quarterfinal 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Dupont
USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Dupont 6-2 7-6 Lea Antonoplis Match data Aug 18, 1979* QF Canadian Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Dupont — — — 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Dupont Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1968 6–11 35.3% — 1,495 0 0 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0
20 1969 2–4 33.3% — 1,494 0 0 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1
21 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,580 0 1 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1971 12–8 60.0% — 1,684 0 1 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2
23 1972 7–14 33.3% — 1,647 0 1 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2
24 1973 13–23 36.1% — 1,642 0 1 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2
25 1974 15–17 46.9% — 1,718 0 1 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2
26 1975 23–22 51.1% — 1,768 0 2 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2
27 1976 25–19 56.8% — 1,820 0 3 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2
28 1977 28–22 56.0% — 1,839 0 5 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1978 24–25 49.0% — 1,730 0 5 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2
30 1979 22–20 52.4% — 1,816 0 6 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2
31 1980 16–23 41.0% — 1,717 0 6 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2
32 1981 7–16 30.4% — 1,638 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1982 6–12 33.3% — 1,593 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,591 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Dupont Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1968 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1969 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1970 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1971 — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 7 11 18 38.9% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3% — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Dupont Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94
19 1968 1496 96.8 — — — — — -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 — — -0.66 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01
20 1969 1494 102.2 — — — — — -26 — 42.9% -0.86 0–2 — — +0.11 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92
21 1970 1580 121.7 — — — — — +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) — — +0.70 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51
22 1971 1685 124.2 — — — — — -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92
23 1972 1648 121.6 — — — — -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.41 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22
24 1973 1643 133.5 — — — — -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.68 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47
25 1974 1719 132.6 — — — — -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.83 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39
26 1975 1768 135.9 — — — — -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.55 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25
27 1976 1821 131.2 — — — — -34 -72 -180 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 0.00 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93
28 1977 1839 143.1 — — — — -96 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -2.78 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71
29 1978 1730 130.7 — — — — -24 +52 -49 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.1 +1.75 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67
30 1979 1816 142.5 — — — — -23 -30 -119 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 -0.40 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78
31 1980 1718 128.9 — — — — -37 +25 — 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -2.83 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
32 1981 1638 117.4 — — — — +57 +8 +67 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1593 108.3 — — — — +94 -39 +49 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1592 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1895 136.1 — — — — -33 -4 -72 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.61 — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.