H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Marjorie Gengler H2H: 4-0
Laura Dupont holds a 4–0 lead over Marjorie Gengler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Laura Dupont leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1976 Johannesburg third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1976* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Dupont | 6-3 6-2 | Marjorie Gengler | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1970* | Rochester | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Laura Dupont | 7-5 6-3 | Marjorie Gengler | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1970* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Dupont | 6-3 4-6 8-6 | Marjorie Gengler | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1968* | Chestnut Hill | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Laura Dupont | 13-11 5-7 6-2 | Marjorie Gengler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Marjorie Gengler | — | — | — | 1,593 | 25 | 31 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Dupont | Marjorie Gengler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 3 |
| 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 3 |
| 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |