H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 2-2
Laura Dupont and Renata Tomanova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 2–1 on clay, while Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1981 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1981* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| May 21, 1977* | Rome | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| May 14, 1977* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Laura Dupont | 5-7 7-6 6-3 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1975* | Denver | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Laura Dupont | 6-4 7-5 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |