H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 1-3
Virginia Ruzici holds a 3–1 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 3–0 on clay, while Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1979 Phoenix third round 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1979* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Dupont | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
| May 20, 1978* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1977* | Oldsmar | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1976 | Toronto | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 4-6 6-2 7-6(7) | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Virginia Ruzici | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |