H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Dupont vs Zenda Liess H2H: 2-0

Laura Dupont holds a 2–0 lead over Zenda Liess in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Dupont leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1977 Indianapolis round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-0.

USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Dupont 2-6 6-3 6-0 Zenda Liess Match data Aug 12, 1977* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Laura Dupont 6-4 6-4 Zenda Liess Match data Apr 1, 1977* R32 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Dupont 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Zenda Liess 1,743 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Dupont Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1974 7–7 50.0% 1,554 0 0
15 1975 4–5 44.4% 1,573 0 0
16 1976 7–4 63.6% 1,668 0 0
17 1977 4–13 23.5% 1,619 0 0
18 1978 16–17 48.5% 1,742 0 0
19 1968 6–11 35.3% 1,495 0 0 1979 3–11 21.4% 1,662 0 0
20 1969 2–4 33.3% 1,494 0 0 1980 1–4 20.0% 1,610 0 0
21 1970 10–7 58.8% 1,580 0 1
22 1971 12–8 60.0% 1,684 0 1
23 1972 7–14 33.3% 1,647 0 1
24 1973 13–23 36.1% 1,642 0 1
25 1974 15–17 46.9% 1,718 0 1
26 1975 23–22 51.1% 1,768 0 2
27 1976 25–19 56.8% 1,820 0 3
28 1977 28–22 56.0% 1,839 0 5
29 1978 24–25 49.0% 1,730 0 5
30 1979 22–20 52.4% 1,816 0 6
31 1980 16–23 41.0% 1,717 0 6
32 1981 7–16 30.4% 1,638 0 6
33 1982 6–12 33.3% 1,593 0 6
34 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,591 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Dupont Zenda Liess
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1974 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1976 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 6 6 0.0%
18 1978 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1968 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
20 1969 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 1 4 5 20.0%
21 1970 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1971 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0%
24 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0%
25 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5%
30 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
31 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9%
32 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3% 9 19 28 32.1% 23 24 47 48.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 13 18 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Dupont Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1974 1554 119.5 -29 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) +0.30
15 1975 1574 114.9 +15 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 -0.13
16 1976 1669 124.1 +28 59.1% +1.09 1–1 +0.18
17 1977 1619 124.4 -92 +63 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.82
18 1978 1743 135.7 -78 -37 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.24
19 1968 1496 96.8 -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 -0.66 1979 1662 120.1 -29 -5 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 -0.45
20 1969 1494 102.2 -26 42.9% -0.86 0–2 +0.11 1980 1610 95.3 -77 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 -0.03
21 1970 1580 121.7 +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) +0.70
22 1971 1685 124.2 -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40
23 1972 1648 121.6 -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.41
24 1973 1643 133.5 -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.68
25 1974 1719 132.6 -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.83
26 1975 1768 135.9 -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.55
27 1976 1821 131.2 -34 -72 -180 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 0.00
28 1977 1839 143.1 -96 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -2.78
29 1978 1730 130.7 -24 +52 -49 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.1 +1.75
30 1979 1816 142.5 -23 -30 -119 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 -0.40
31 1980 1718 128.9 -37 +25 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -2.83
32 1981 1638 117.4 +57 +8 +67 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.31
33 1982 1593 108.3 +94 -39 +49 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.10
34 1983 1592 108.1 0.0% -4.50 -0.31
Career 1895 136.1 -33 -4 -72 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.61 1744 131.4 -71 +6 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.