H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Laura Garrone vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 0-1

Debbie Spence Nasim holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Debbie Spence Nasim leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Debbie Spence Nasim won the 1986 Charleston Open round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Garrone
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Debbie Spence Nasim
USA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Debbie Spence Nasim 6-3 6-3 Laura Garrone #92 Match data Apr 25, 1986* R16 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Garrone #262 #32 90 1,726 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Debbie Spence Nasim — — — 1,827 56 62 47.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Garrone Debbie Spence Nasim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1983 4–2 66.7% — 1,565 0 0
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #234 1,491 0 0 1984 9–7 56.2% — 1,649 0 1
17 1985 5–5 50.0% #203 1,530 0 0 1985 25–19 56.8% — 1,777 0 1
18 1986 22–14 61.1% #38 1,678 0 0 1986 13–22 37.1% — 1,619 0 1
19 1987 15–17 46.9% #86 1,611 0 0 1987 4–11 26.7% — 1,554 0 1
20 1988 17–17 50.0% #64 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1989 14–17 45.2% #87 1,607 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% — 1,557 0 1
22 1990 14–15 48.3% #65 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1991 10–14 41.7% #93 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1992 5–12 29.4% #156 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1993 0–3 0.0% #169 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1994 2–5 28.6% #167 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1995 2–5 28.6% #194 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1996 1–3 25.0% #258 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1997 2–2 50.0% #224 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Garrone Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 8 8 16 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1987 3 7 10 30.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 — — — — 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 22 34 35.3% 88 90 178 49.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 11 15 26.7% — 26 27 53 49.1% 25 20 45 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Garrone Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1565 107.6 — — — — +78 — — 61.5% +0.38 1–0 2–0 — +0.32
16 1984 1491 101.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04 1984 1649 120.5 — — — — +26 -52 — 55.0% +0.22 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 +0.47
17 1985 1530 112.1 — — — — +27 +58 — 50.0% +0.09 1–1 — — +1.29 1985 1777 141.5 — — — — -50 -20 — 54.7% +0.34 7–4 (64%) 3–6 (33%) 103.0 -1.69
18 1986 1679 134.8 — — — — -125 +127 — 60.2% +0.82 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 +2.90 1986 1619 116.9 — — — — -1 +131 -90 35.5% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.9 +0.57
19 1987 1612 116.6 — — — — -75 +112 -43 46.7% -0.13 6–7 (46%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +4.27 1987 1555 115.2 — — — — +10 +132 — 29.0% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.23
20 1988 1638 122.2 — — — — -120 +69 — 49.4% -0.04 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 1608 123.3 — — — — -78 +56 — 44.1% -0.31 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +2.18 1989 1558 101.4 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.33 1–0 0–1 — +0.20
22 1990 1609 114.2 — — — — -61 +31 — 47.8% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1991 1623 119.5 — — — — -83 -31 +17 42.6% -0.87 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.5 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 1559 114.1 — — — — -34 +20 — 32.4% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.6 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 1522 103.3 — — — — — +11 — 25.0% -1.37 0–2 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 1520 113.3 — — — — — +23 — 37.5% -0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 1492 97.8 — — — — — +14 — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 1468 98.9 — — — — — +5 — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 0–1 — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 1501 112.4 — — — — — +13 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.1 — — — — -79 +56 -17 46.4% -0.19 36–45 (44%) 18–21 (46%) 97.2 +5.60 — 1827 129.7 — — — — -4 +41 -90 46.5% -0.34 20–10 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 107.8 -0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.