H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Golarsa vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-3
Ann Grossman holds a 3–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1994 Rome third round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1994* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1993* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-3 6-4 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| May 29, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 7-5 6-0 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Golarsa | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |