H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Golarsa vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 1-2
Natalia Medvedeva holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Golarsa won the 1995 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1995* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Laura Golarsa | 6-3 6-1 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1993* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Natalia Medvedeva | 4-6 7-6 7-5 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1992* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-1 3-6 6-0 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Golarsa | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |