H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Granville vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 0-2

Amanda Coetzer holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 Charleston Open round of 32 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #18 6-2 7-6(4) Laura Granville #34 Match data Apr 10, 2003* R32 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amanda Coetzer #23 6-4 6-1 Laura Granville #41 Match data Feb 22, 2003* SF Memphis Classic Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Granville Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0
18 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0
20 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0
21 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2
22 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3
23 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3
24 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3
25 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5
26 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6
28 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7
29 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Granville Amanda Coetzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Granville Amanda Coetzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21
17 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21
18 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77
20 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99
21 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59
22 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72
23 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38
24 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
25 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54
26 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82
27 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50
28 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42
29 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28
Career — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44 — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.