H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Granville vs Ansley Cargill H2H: 3-0

Laura Granville holds a 3–0 lead over Ansley Cargill in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Granville leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2005 Quebec City round of 32 6-4 6-2.

USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 0
3 main-draw meetings
USA Age 44 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Granville #60 6-4 6-2 Ansley Cargill #322 Match data Nov 3, 2005* R32 Quebec City Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Laura Granville #47 6-4 6-0 Ansley Cargill #90 Match data Aug 27, 2003* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Laura Granville #28 6-2 6-2 Ansley Cargill #90 Match data Jun 11, 2003* R64 Birmingham Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ansley Cargill #389 #90 400 1,564 6 18 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Granville Ansley Cargill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 1–1 50.0% 1,512 0 0
18 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #268 1,484 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #232 1,476 0 0
20 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #122 1,484 0 0
21 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0 2003 4–9 30.8% #110 1,475 0 0
22 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #241 1,463 0 0
23 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #301 1,453 0 0
24 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0
25 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0
26 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0
28 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0
29 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Granville Ansley Cargill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 2 4 6 33.3%
21 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2004 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2005 7 13 20 35.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
25 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 2008 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2009 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2010 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 12 15 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 71/167 of Laura Granville's and 4/15 of Ansley Cargill's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Granville Ansley Cargill
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 —/— 2003 3/13 0.0 1.7 63.7% 45.3% 30.2% 51.2% 33.3% 39.8% 30.5%
22 2003 8/44 1.4 2.8 61.8% 60.8% 50.1% 51.8% 41.7% 56.7% 47.3% 2004 1/2 1.0 0.0 79.7% 62.7% 30.8% 62.5% 56.3% 23.4%
23 2004 5/36 1.0 2.4 61.3% 58.6% 50.7% 61.2% 54.8% 55.6% 42.0% —/—
24 2005 9/27 1.1 1.6 65.1% 64.3% 53.0% 50.2% 56.4% 60.4% 39.3% —/—
25 2006 20/28 1.7 2.6 63.3% 64.3% 46.6% 60.2% 45.3% 58.0% 42.2% —/—
26 2007 23/26 1.8 2.3 67.0% 59.8% 46.1% 58.3% 50.4% 55.3% 40.4% —/—
27 2008 2/2 3.0 1.0 73.1% 51.1% 42.9% 43.7% 22.5% 48.9% 30.0% —/—
28 2009 2/2 1.5 1.5 56.1% 54.9% 44.4% 29.2% 0.0% 50.3% 29.9% —/—
29 2010 2/2 2.0 1.0 58.9% 64.5% 48.8% 33.3% 25.0% 58.0% 30.4% —/—
Career 71/194 1.6 2.3 64.4% 61.4% 47.8% 55.3% 46.1% 56.6% 40.8% 4/24 0.3 1.3 67.7% 49.6% 30.4% 54.0% 25.0% 43.9% 28.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Granville Ansley Cargill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1512 104.8 50.0% -0.50 +0.12
18 1999 1501 95.2 0.0% -4.50 +0.04 2000 1484 99.0 0.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.20
19 2001 1477 104.1 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.06
20 2001 1486 117.9 +27 14.3% -3.14 0–1 -0.28 2002 1485 113.6 +22 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 -0.18
21 2002 1638 133.0 -22 +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79 2003 1475 100.9 -3.24 -2.26 0.507 35.7% +2 +72 27.6% -1.93 3–0 (100%) 1–0 -0.51
22 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59 2004 1463 107.6 +1.85 -2.17 0.535 42.3% 20.0% -1.60 0–1 -0.12
23 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57 2005 1454 98.8 0.0% -3.00 -0.07
24 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) -0.60
25 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28
26 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20
27 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% 0.0% -3.50 -0.41
28 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% 0.0% -4.25 0–1 -0.04
29 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% 0.0% -3.00 -0.13
Career 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44 1564 108.0 -1.97 -2.24 0.512 37.4% +13 +72 27.3% -1.67 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.