H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Granville vs Barbara Schett H2H: 1-1

Laura Granville and Barbara Schett are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay, while Laura Granville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2003 Berlin Open round of 64 3-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Schett #55 3-6 7-5 6-3 Laura Granville #33 Match data May 7, 2003* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Laura Granville #37 7-6(6) 6-1 Barbara Schett #46 Match data Feb 27, 2003* R32 Scottsdale Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,976 259 228 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Granville Barbara Schett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,486 0 0
17 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
18 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,530 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,584 0 0
20 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1
21 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,752 0 2
22 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2
23 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,937 0 2
24 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0 2000 30–23 56.6% #22 1,825 0 3
25 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,759 0 3
26 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,751 0 3
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,625 0 3
28 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,574 0 3
29 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,576 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Granville Barbara Schett
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2000 13 13 26 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 13 11 24 54.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 8 10 18 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — 114 112 226 50.4% 102 73 175 58.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 31 31 62 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 71/167 of Laura Granville's and 14/73 of Barbara Schett's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Granville Barbara Schett
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2003 8/44 1.4 2.8 61.8% 60.8% 50.1% 51.8% 41.7% 56.7% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 5/36 1.0 2.4 61.3% 58.6% 50.7% 61.2% 54.8% 55.6% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 9/27 1.1 1.6 65.1% 64.3% 53.0% 50.2% 56.4% 60.4% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 20/28 1.7 2.6 63.3% 64.3% 46.6% 60.2% 45.3% 58.0% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 23/26 1.8 2.3 67.0% 59.8% 46.1% 58.3% 50.4% 55.3% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 2/2 3.0 1.0 73.1% 51.1% 42.9% 43.7% 22.5% 48.9% 30.0% 2003 7/39 3.1 2.4 61.7% 62.8% 46.0% 58.0% 34.7% 56.3% 42.4%
28 2009 2/2 1.5 1.5 56.1% 54.9% 44.4% 29.2% 0.0% 50.3% 29.9% 2004 5/32 3.8 3.4 62.9% 60.9% 41.9% 49.1% 41.2% 54.1% 45.3%
29 2010 2/2 2.0 1.0 58.9% 64.5% 48.8% 33.3% 25.0% 58.0% 30.4% 2005 2/2 4.0 4.5 55.0% 64.3% 40.4% 74.1% 41.1% 53.7% 39.3%
Career — 71/194 1.6 2.3 64.4% 61.4% 47.8% 55.3% 46.1% 56.6% 40.8% — 14/487 3.5 3.1 61.2% 62.4% 43.7% 57.1% 38.0% 55.2% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Granville Barbara Schett
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1492 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.10
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1487 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.21
17 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12 1993 1547 118.8 — — — — +14 +19 — 45.0% -0.25 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.73
18 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 1994 1531 115.7 — — — — +14 +72 — 44.9% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +0.38
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1585 128.8 — — — — -34 +53 — 46.3% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.72
20 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28 1996 1759 146.4 — — — — -85 +20 — 54.6% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 1–6 (14%) 103.2 -1.38
21 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79 1997 1752 144.0 — — — — -105 +101 — 53.3% +0.26 7–9 (44%) 6–2 (75%) 102.6 +0.55
22 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59 1998 1822 150.4 — — — — -60 +37 — 58.2% +0.72 7–14 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 94.3 -1.19
23 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57 1999 1937 163.4 — — — — -17 -70 -291 62.7% +1.08 13–9 (59%) 8–9 (47%) 101.1 -0.50
24 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60 2000 1825 147.2 — — — — +26 +52 — 58.5% +0.52 9–12 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 90.3 +1.95
25 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28 2001 1760 148.2 — — — — +23 +63 -107 53.2% +0.46 8–8 (50%) 7–9 (44%) 95.6 -0.61
26 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20 2002 1752 138.0 — — — — +9 +19 — 54.5% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.34
27 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41 2003 1625 120.3 +0.36 -0.33 0.971 49.1% -22 +119 — 40.7% -0.78 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 96.2 -0.90
28 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04 2004 1575 114.7 -0.23 -0.21 0.988 49.7% +19 +86 +31 43.8% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 +0.88
29 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 2005 1577 100.5 +0.57 +0.30 0.850 47.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.22
Career — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1977 148.8 +0.18 -0.20 0.959 49.1% -17 +47 -124 53.4% +0.32 80–87 (48%) 48–61 (44%) 91.7 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.