H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Granville vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-1

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 2006 Libéma Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #573 7-5 6-3 Laura Granville #53 Match data Jun 22, 2006* R32 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Granville Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0
18 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0
20 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2
22 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3
23 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3
24 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5
25 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6
26 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7
28 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7
29 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Granville Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
18 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
24 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
26 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2%
27 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Granville Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98
17 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87
18 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09
20 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70
21 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55
22 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23
23 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33
24 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45
25 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96
26 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20
27 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05
28 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
29 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16
Career — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44 — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.