H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Granville vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 2-0

Laura Granville holds a 2–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Granville leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2003 Miami Open round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Granville #34 6-2 6-3 Daja Bedanova #48 Match data Mar 21, 2003* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Laura Granville #62 3-6 6-4 6-1 Daja Bedanova #21 Match data Aug 22, 2002* R32 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Granville Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1
18 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1
20 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1
21 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1
23 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Granville Daja Bedanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Granville Daja Bedanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06
17 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15
18 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10
20 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74
21 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49
23 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.