H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Granville vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 1-0

Laura Granville holds a 1–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Granville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2007 Miami Open round of 128 6-4 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Granville #67 6-4 7-6(0) Lourdes Domínguez Lino #65 Match data Mar 20, 2007* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Granville Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Granville Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Granville Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.