H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Granville vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 1-1
Laura Granville and María Emilia Salerni are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, María Emilia Salerni won the 2004 Quebec City fourth round 7-6(0) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2004* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | María Emilia Salerni | 7-6(0) 7-5 | Laura Granville | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2004* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laura Granville | 6-4 7-6(4) | María Emilia Salerni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,553 | 30 | 60 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Granville | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |