H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Granville vs Meilen Tu H2H: 1-2
Meilen Tu holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Meilen Tu leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Laura Granville leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2006 San Diego second round 6-4 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2006* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Meilen Tu | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | Laura Granville | Match data |
| May 28, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Laura Granville | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2001* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Meilen Tu | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Laura Granville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Granville | Meilen Tu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |