H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Granville vs Romina Oprandi H2H: 1-0
Laura Granville holds a 1–0 lead over Romina Oprandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Granville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2007 Auckland third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2007* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Granville | 6-3 6-4 | Romina Oprandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Granville | Romina Oprandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |