H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Lauren Davis vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 0-3
Casey Dellacqua holds a 3–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Casey Dellacqua leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2015 Birmingham second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2015* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Casey Dellacqua | 6-4 6-1 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2015* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Casey Dellacqua | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2014* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Casey Dellacqua | (def.) | Lauren Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lauren Davis | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |