H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Lauren Davis vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 1-1
Lauren Davis and Jarmila Wolfe are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on grass, while Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2015 Eastbourne second round 2-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2015* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Jarmila Wolfe | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2014* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lauren Davis | 6-4 7-6(8) | Jarmila Wolfe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lauren Davis | Jarmila Wolfe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |