H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lauren Davis vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 1-1

Lauren Davis and Jarmila Wolfe are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on grass, while Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2015 Eastbourne Open round of 64 2-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarmila Wolfe #58 2-6 6-2 6-1 Lauren Davis #79 Match data Jun 24, 2015* R64 Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Lauren Davis #67 6-4 7-6(8) Jarmila Wolfe #265 Match data Jan 9, 2014* R32 Sydney International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lauren Davis Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0
19 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0
22 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1
24 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2
25 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2
26 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2
28 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2
30 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lauren Davis Jarmila Wolfe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9% — — — — — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/325 of Lauren Davis's and 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lauren Davis Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0% 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9%
28 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7% 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4%
29 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8% 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1%
30 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7% — 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lauren Davis Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09
17 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
18 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03
19 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14
20 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59
21 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54
22 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65
23 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85
24 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13
25 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36
26 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26
27 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49
28 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27
29 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07
30 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56 — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.