H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Lauren Davis vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-4

Venus Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2019 Cincinnati second round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lauren Davis
USA Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2019* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #65 7-5 6-2 Lauren Davis #69 Match data
Jan 4, 2019* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Venus Williams #39 6-4 6-3 Lauren Davis #173 Match data
Jan 22, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #18 6-2 6-3 Lauren Davis #53 Match data
Jan 10, 2015* Auckland WTA 250 SF Hard Venus Williams #19 6-0 6-3 Lauren Davis #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,823 140 181 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lauren Davis Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,576 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,649 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,578 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2016 12–9 57.1% #61 1,668 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2017 20–21 48.8% #50 1,634 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,610 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,681 0 2 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,593 0 2 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47