H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laurence Courtois vs Amelie Cocheteux H2H: 0-1

Amelie Cocheteux holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amelie Cocheteux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amelie Cocheteux won the 1999 Kuala Lumpur round of 16 7-6 7-6.

BEL Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 48 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amelie Cocheteux #68 7-6 7-6 Laurence Courtois #82 Match data Nov 12, 1999* R16 Kuala Lumpur Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laurence Courtois #484 #37 565 1,701 75 94 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amelie Cocheteux #365 #55 552 1,583 28 53 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Courtois Amelie Cocheteux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 3–3 50.0% #104 1,520 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #228 1,489 0 0
18 1994 8–13 38.1% #105 1,545 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #166 1,468 0 0
19 1995 14–14 50.0% #64 1,624 0 0 1997 2–3 40.0% #104 1,492 0 0
20 1996 20–16 55.6% #44 1,697 0 0 1998 7–11 38.9% #81 1,529 0 0
21 1997 4–9 30.8% #183 1,647 0 0 1999 15–19 44.1% #64 1,565 0 0
22 1998 4–9 30.8% #125 1,578 0 0 2000 4–17 19.0% #180 1,463 0 0
23 1999 13–17 43.3% #78 1,546 0 0
24 2000 6–10 37.5% #130 1,538 0 0
25 2001 3–3 50.0% #166 1,540 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Courtois Amelie Cocheteux
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1996 9 7 16 56.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 22 31 53 41.5% 32 37 69 46.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 12 15 27 44.4% 11 17 28 39.3% 12 23 35 34.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 6 10 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Courtois Amelie Cocheteux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1993 1521 107.7 +38 +20 53.3% +0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.37 1995 1490 99.1 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 +0.07
18 1994 1545 117.7 +33 +35 40.0% -1.20 4–4 (50%) 3–0 (100%) +0.11 1996 1468 94.6 0.0% -3.25 +0.18
19 1995 1625 121.6 -31 -14 -24 50.0% -0.24 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.7 +0.28 1997 1492 108.2 +57 36.4% -1.00 1–0 0–1 +0.11
20 1996 1698 120.0 -38 -71 -19 50.0% -0.11 11–5 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 109.5 +1.19 1998 1530 115.1 +15 +34 41.0% -0.72 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 +0.42
21 1997 1648 109.2 +21 -63 37.0% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.6 +0.08 1999 1565 110.5 +39 -57 -53 42.0% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 107.5 +1.17
22 1998 1579 117.9 +32 -27 41.9% -0.13 0–5 (0%) 0–1 +0.02 2000 1463 103.9 +81 -6 28.3% -1.89 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.44
23 1999 1546 109.3 +1 +26 +89 45.2% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.88
24 2000 1539 113.0 +52 40.0% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 -0.15
25 2001 1540 100.3 +39 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 +0.63
Career 1701 119.8 -4 +2 +6 45.3% -0.37 33–34 (49%) 26–23 (53%) 102.4 +2.66 1583 110.6 +49 -5 -53 36.6% -1.18 9–11 (45%) 8–7 (53%) 100.7 +1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.