H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laurence Courtois vs Conchita Martínez Granados H2H: 0-1
Conchita Martínez Granados holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez Granados leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez Granados won the 1998 Bogota quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1998* | Bogota | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Conchita Martínez Granados | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Laurence Courtois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Conchita Martínez Granados | #587 | #66 | 538 | 1,579 | 29 | 48 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Courtois | Conchita Martínez Granados | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #110 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #204 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #150 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #321 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |