H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Laurence Courtois vs Elena Makarova H2H: 0-1
Elena Makarova holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Makarova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elena Makarova won the 1996 Linz quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 53
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1996* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Elena Makarova | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Laurence Courtois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Makarova | — | — | — | 1,755 | 59 | 72 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Courtois | Elena Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |