H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laurence Courtois vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-0

Laurence Courtois holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1996 Birmingham round of 16 7-6 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laurence Courtois
BEL Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laurence Courtois #46 7-6 2-6 6-1 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Jun 14, 1996* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laurence Courtois #484 #37 565 1,701 75 94 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Courtois Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,802 0 2
15 — — — — — — — 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,872 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2
17 1993 3–3 50.0% #104 1,520 0 0 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2
18 1994 8–13 38.1% #105 1,545 0 0 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3
19 1995 14–14 50.0% #64 1,624 0 0 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,974 0 4
20 1996 20–16 55.6% #44 1,697 0 0 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,901 0 4
21 1997 4–9 30.8% #183 1,647 0 0 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,811 0 4
22 1998 4–9 30.8% #125 1,578 0 0 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4
23 1999 13–17 43.3% #78 1,546 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4
24 2000 6–10 37.5% #130 1,538 0 0 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4
25 2001 3–3 50.0% #166 1,540 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 — — — — — — — 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,554 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Courtois Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1993 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
19 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1996 9 7 16 56.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 22 31 53 41.5% 32 37 69 46.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 12 15 27 44.4% — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Courtois Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.05
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1803 134.8 — — — — -10 -130 -221 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.37
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1872 149.0 — — — — -69 -6 -215 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -4.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1845 139.2 — — — — -45 +103 -185 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +3.06
17 1993 1521 107.7 — — — — +38 +20 — 53.3% +0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.37 1984 1851 137.1 — — — — -38 +58 -143 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.60
18 1994 1545 117.7 — — — — +33 +35 — 40.0% -1.20 4–4 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.11 1985 1976 158.8 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -2.76
19 1995 1625 121.6 — — — — -31 -14 -24 50.0% -0.24 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.7 +0.28 1986 1975 157.9 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.03
20 1996 1698 120.0 — — — — -38 -71 -19 50.0% -0.11 11–5 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 109.5 +1.19 1987 1902 131.1 — — — — +35 +51 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.0 -0.03
21 1997 1648 109.2 — — — — +21 -63 — 37.0% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.6 +0.08 1988 1812 123.2 — — — — +51 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.23
22 1998 1579 117.9 — — — — +32 -27 — 41.9% -0.13 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — +0.02 1989 1788 141.2 — — — — +17 +110 -20 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.08
23 1999 1546 109.3 — — — — +1 +26 +89 45.2% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.88 1990 1698 132.2 — — — — +65 +102 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06
24 2000 1539 113.0 — — — — — +52 — 40.0% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 -0.15 1991 1590 119.7 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93
25 2001 1540 100.3 — — — — — +39 — 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 +0.63 1992 1586 115.2 — — — — -5 +158 +152 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -57 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -34 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42
Career — 1701 119.8 — — — — -4 +2 +6 45.3% -0.37 33–34 (49%) 26–23 (53%) 102.4 +2.66 — 2083 145.9 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.