H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laurence Courtois vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 2-0
Laurence Courtois holds a 2–0 lead over Kimberly Po Messerli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1996 Jakarta third round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1996* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laurence Courtois | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1995* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laurence Courtois | 6-4 6-3 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Courtois | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |