H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Laurence Courtois and Maria Strandlund Tomsvik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on grass, while Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1996 Birmingham round of 32 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Courtois | 6-2 6-2 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data | Jun 13, 1996* | R32 | Birmingham | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 6-2 7-6 | Laurence Courtois | Match data | Jan 4, 1995* | R64 | Jakarta | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,701 | 75 | 94 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,625 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laurence Courtois | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Laurence Courtois | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1988 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1995 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1989 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1996 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1997 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1998 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | 22 | 31 | 53 | 41.5% | 32 | 37 | 69 | 46.4% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | Career | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 14 | 30 | 44 | 31.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Laurence Courtois | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1993 | 1521 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | +38 | +20 | — | 53.3% | +0.73 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.9 | +0.37 | 1987 | 1504 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.37 |
| 1994 | 1545 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +33 | +35 | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.11 | 1988 | 1578 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -8 | — | 45.5% | -0.15 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.9 | +0.45 |
| 1995 | 1625 | 121.6 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -14 | -24 | 50.0% | -0.24 | 3–3 (50%) | 8–3 (73%) | 105.7 | +0.28 | 1989 | 1612 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -33 | — | 44.3% | -0.85 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 1996 | 1698 | 120.0 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -71 | -19 | 50.0% | -0.11 | 11–5 (69%) | 5–2 (71%) | 109.5 | +1.19 | 1990 | 1589 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -55 | — | 32.7% | -1.00 | 5–3 (63%) | 0–5 (0%) | 99.0 | -0.92 |
| 1997 | 1648 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -63 | — | 37.0% | -1.26 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.6 | +0.08 | 1991 | 1554 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -34 | +68 | 35.7% | -0.98 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.8 | -0.11 |
| 1998 | 1579 | 117.9 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -27 | — | 41.9% | -0.13 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.02 | 1992 | 1520 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.57 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.32 |
| 1999 | 1546 | 109.3 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +26 | +89 | 45.2% | -0.32 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–5 (38%) | 97.3 | +1.88 | 1993 | 1560 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.82 |
| 2000 | 1539 | 113.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +52 | — | 40.0% | -0.27 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.8 | -0.15 | 1994 | 1546 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.30 |
| 2001 | 1540 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | 47.1% | -0.18 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.4 | +0.63 | 1995 | 1545 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -11 | +27 | 40.8% | -0.86 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | -0.97 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1527 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.67 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1515 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.13 |
| Career | 1701 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +2 | +6 | 45.3% | -0.37 | 33–34 (49%) | 26–23 (53%) | 102.4 | +2.66 | Career | 1625 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -29 | +45 | 38.2% | -0.87 | 23–24 (49%) | 6–16 (27%) | 97.8 | -1.28 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 19, 1999 | H2H |
| Anne-Gaelle Sidot | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 8, 2001 | H2H |
| Barbara Rittner | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Nathalie Dechy | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 14, 2000 | H2H |
| Anna Smashnova | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 13, 1999 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 2, 1995 | H2H |
| Silke Meier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Emanuela Zardo | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 20, 1993 | H2H |
| Laurence Courtois | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 13, 1996 | H2H |