H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Laurence Courtois vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-1

Laurence Courtois and Nancy Feber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on grass, while Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1996 Jakarta round of 16 3-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laurence Courtois
BEL Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laurence Courtois #59 3-6 6-1 6-1 Nancy Feber #99 Match data Apr 13, 1996* R16 Jakarta Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Nancy Feber #155 6-0 6-1 Laurence Courtois #74 Match data Jun 22, 1994* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laurence Courtois #484 #37 565 1,701 75 94 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Courtois Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1993 3–3 50.0% #104 1,520 0 0 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1994 8–13 38.1% #105 1,545 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1995 14–14 50.0% #64 1,624 0 0 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1996 20–16 55.6% #44 1,697 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1997 4–9 30.8% #183 1,647 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1998 4–9 30.8% #125 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1999 13–17 43.3% #78 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2000 6–10 37.5% #130 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2001 3–3 50.0% #166 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Courtois Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1996 9 7 16 56.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 31 53 41.5% 32 37 69 46.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 12 15 27 44.4% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Courtois Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 1993 1521 107.7 — — — — +38 +20 — 53.3% +0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.37 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1994 1545 117.7 — — — — +33 +35 — 40.0% -1.20 4–4 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.11 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1995 1625 121.6 — — — — -31 -14 -24 50.0% -0.24 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.7 +0.28 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1996 1698 120.0 — — — — -38 -71 -19 50.0% -0.11 11–5 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 109.5 +1.19 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1997 1648 109.2 — — — — +21 -63 — 37.0% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.6 +0.08 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
22 1998 1579 117.9 — — — — +32 -27 — 41.9% -0.13 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1546 109.3 — — — — +1 +26 +89 45.2% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1539 113.0 — — — — — +52 — 40.0% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1540 100.3 — — — — — +39 — 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1701 119.8 — — — — -4 +2 +6 45.3% -0.37 33–34 (49%) 26–23 (53%) 102.4 +2.66 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.