H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laurence Courtois vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-1
Laurence Courtois and Nancy Feber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on grass, while Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1996 Jakarta fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Left-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1996* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laurence Courtois | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Nancy Feber | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nancy Feber | 6-0 6-1 | Laurence Courtois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nancy Feber | #589 | #79 | 219 | 1,567 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Courtois | Nancy Feber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |