H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laurence Courtois vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 1-0
Laurence Courtois holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Arendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1995 Amelia Island third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1995* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laurence Courtois | 6-2 7-6 | Nicole Arendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Courtois | Nicole Arendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |