H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laurence Courtois vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 1-1

Laurence Courtois and Tami Whitlinger Jones are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on clay, while Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1996 Strasbourg Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laurence Courtois
BEL Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laurence Courtois #43 6-4 6-3 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data May 23, 1996* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-7 6-0 6-1 Laurence Courtois #75 Match data Feb 16, 1995* R32 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laurence Courtois #484 #37 565 1,701 75 94 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Courtois Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 3–3 50.0% #104 1,520 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
18 1994 8–13 38.1% #105 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 14–14 50.0% #64 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 20–16 55.6% #44 1,697 0 0 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0
21 1997 4–9 30.8% #183 1,647 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,576 0 0
22 1998 4–9 30.8% #125 1,578 0 0 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1999 13–17 43.3% #78 1,546 0 0 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,644 0 0
24 2000 6–10 37.5% #130 1,538 0 0 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,650 0 0
25 2001 3–3 50.0% #166 1,540 0 0 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,709 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,700 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,694 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,596 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Courtois Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1993 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 9 7 16 56.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 22 31 53 41.5% 32 37 69 46.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 12 15 27 44.4% — 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Courtois Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1993 1521 107.7 — — — — +38 +20 — 53.3% +0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.37 1986 1494 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
18 1994 1545 117.7 — — — — +33 +35 — 40.0% -1.20 4–4 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1625 121.6 — — — — -31 -14 -24 50.0% -0.24 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.7 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1698 120.0 — — — — -38 -71 -19 50.0% -0.11 11–5 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 109.5 +1.19 1989 1525 121.7 — — — — +38 — — 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49
21 1997 1648 109.2 — — — — +21 -63 — 37.0% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.6 +0.08 1990 1577 126.7 — — — — +71 -98 — 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78
22 1998 1579 117.9 — — — — +32 -27 — 41.9% -0.13 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — +0.02 1991 1682 133.2 — — — — -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08
23 1999 1546 109.3 — — — — +1 +26 +89 45.2% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.88 1992 1645 120.9 — — — — +15 -10 — 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65
24 2000 1539 113.0 — — — — — +52 — 40.0% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 -0.15 1993 1651 135.8 — — — — +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72
25 2001 1540 100.3 — — — — — +39 — 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 +0.63 1994 1709 145.5 — — — — +28 — — 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1701 136.6 — — — — -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1694 132.0 — — — — +28 -56 — 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1596 120.8 — — — — +84 -20 — 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98
Career — 1701 119.8 — — — — -4 +2 +6 45.3% -0.37 33–34 (49%) 26–23 (53%) 102.4 +2.66 — 1778 139.7 — — — — +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.