H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laurie Tenney vs Mary Struthers H2H: 1-1
Laurie Tenney and Mary Struthers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Struthers leads 1–0 on clay, while Laurie Tenney leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Struthers won the 1976 Rome second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1976* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mary Struthers | 7-5 6-2 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1970* | San Diego Metro | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Laurie Tenney | 6-4 6-3 | Mary Struthers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurie Tenney | — | — | — | 1,720 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mary Struthers | — | — | — | 1,778 | 90 | 93 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurie Tenney | Mary Struthers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1970 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 17–11 | 60.7% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1974 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 11–5 | 68.8% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1975 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1976 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 4 |