H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Laxmi Poruri vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 1-0
Laxmi Poruri holds a 1–0 lead over Kimberly Po Messerli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laxmi Poruri leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laxmi Poruri won the 1995 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1995* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Laxmi Poruri | 6-3 6-7 7-5 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laxmi Poruri | #635 | #110 | 209 | 1,556 | 14 | 30 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laxmi Poruri | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #111 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |