H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Laxmi Poruri vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Laxmi Poruri in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 Key Biscayne second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laxmi Poruri
USA Age 53 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-3 Laxmi Poruri #143 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Laxmi Poruri #635 #110 209 1,556 14 30 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laxmi Poruri Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1988 2–2 50.0% #191 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #167 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 0–2 0.0% #416 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1994 0–1 0.0% #196 1,483 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1995 7–9 43.8% #145 1,523 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1996 2–9 18.2% #111 1,477 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 — — — — — — — 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8