H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Andrea Leand H2H: 0-1

Andrea Leand holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Leand won the 1983 Palm Beach round of 64 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Leand
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Leand 7-5 6-2 Lea Antonoplis Match data Feb 1, 1983* R64 Palm Beach WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,881 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Andrea Leand
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,812 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,784 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,774 0 1
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,627 0 1
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Andrea Leand
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9%
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Andrea Leand
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1981 1564 118.3 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.64
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1982 1813 151.1 — — — — +80 -158 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -2.70
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1983 1785 132.5 — — — — +54 -45 -182 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.64
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1984 1775 142.9 — — — — +39 -6 -186 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.75
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1985 1681 93.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.61
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.24
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1989 1579 123.9 — — — — +89 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.47
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1991 1505 113.3 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1994 1472 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1882 138.5 — — — — +56 -85 -134 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.