H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 0-1
Andrea Temesvari holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1985 Delray Beach third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1985* | Delray Beach | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Temesvari | 6-2 7-5 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Antonoplis | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |