H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 0-1

Betty Ann Grubb holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Betty Ann Grubb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Betty Ann Grubb won the 1973 Santa Monica final 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Betty Ann Grubb
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Betty Ann Grubb 6-1 7-5 Lea Antonoplis Match data Sep 5, 1973* F Santa Monica WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Betty Ann Grubb — — — 1,825 124 112 52.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lea Antonoplis Betty Ann Grubb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 1968 21–8 72.4% — 1,633 0 2
1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 1969 29–14 67.4% — 1,777 0 4
1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1970 18–15 54.5% — 1,684 0 4
1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1971 5–11 31.2% — 1,679 0 4
1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1972 2–2 50.0% — 1,673 0 5
1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1973 4–4 50.0% — 1,699 0 6
1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1974 7–10 41.2% — 1,675 0 6
1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1975 5–4 55.6% — 1,728 0 6
1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1976 2–4 33.3% — 1,683 0 6
1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,652 0 6
1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1978 3–1 75.0% — 1,660 0 6
1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1979 25–26 49.0% — 1,817 0 6
1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 1980 2–9 18.2% — 1,722 0 6
1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,710 0 6
1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 — — — — — — —
1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 — — — — — — —
1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —
1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Lea Antonoplis Betty Ann Grubb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1969 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1971 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1975 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1979 8 9 17 47.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% Career 52 38 90 57.8% 22 19 41 53.7% 33 28 61 54.1% 8 25 33 24.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lea Antonoplis Betty Ann Grubb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 1968 1633 121.5 — — — — +94 +16 -113 69.8% +1.56 3–2 (60%) — — 0.00
1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 1969 1777 129.3 — — — — +55 — -18 64.1% +0.96 5–3 (63%) — — +1.73
1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 1970 1685 118.2 — — — — +114 -50 +6 53.4% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — +0.50
1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1971 1680 131.9 — — — — +54 -42 +16 25.0% -1.81 2–0 0–2 — -2.09
1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1972 1673 104.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.16
1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1973 1700 124.2 — — — — +39 — — 47.1% -0.35 1–0 0–1 — +0.31
1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1974 1676 118.4 — — — — -14 -33 — 47.2% +0.08 1–3 (25%) 0–5 (0%) 92.5 +0.24
1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1975 1728 114.2 — — — — +19 — — 47.4% -0.31 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 +0.28
1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1976 1684 105.1 — — — — +18 — — 33.3% -0.58 — 0–2 — +0.80
1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1977 1653 100.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.15
1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1978 1661 112.6 — — — — — — — 75.0% +2.63 — — — +0.34
1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1979 1818 140.8 — — — — -47 -173 -43 45.3% -0.42 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 106.5 -1.02
1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 1980 1723 127.3 — — — — -71 — +66 33.3% -1.07 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.6 -1.35
1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 1981 1710 110.7 — — — — -33 — — 33.3% -0.50 — 0–1 — -0.04
1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 Career 1825 134.0 — — — — +18 -51 -20 51.1% +0.14 32–23 (58%) 9–20 (31%) 97.8 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.