H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 1-1

Lea Antonoplis and Camille Benjamin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on grass, while Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1983 Australian Open round of 64 3-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camille Benjamin 3-6 6-4 6-1 Lea Antonoplis Match data Dec 3, 1983* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Lea Antonoplis 6-0 5-7 6-3 Camille Benjamin Match data Sep 29, 1983* R32 Bakersfield WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Camille Benjamin — #27 13 1,821 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Camille Benjamin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,629 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 1993 1–3 25.0% — 1,516 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Camille Benjamin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Camille Benjamin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 1982 1690 123.6 — — — — +58 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.7 +0.09
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1983 1716 124.5 — — — — -16 -37 -117 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.48
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1984 1768 138.9 — — — — -53 -5 -97 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.31
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1985 1629 116.9 — — — — +23 +3 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.67
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1986 1609 118.7 — — — — -5 +36 +19 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.68
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1987 1655 128.4 — — — — -4 -9 +6 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 -0.10
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1988 1601 121.0 — — — — -5 +27 +18 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.03
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1989 1652 129.0 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.46
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1991 1560 107.1 — — — — -32 +85 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 1992 1528 113.1 — — — — -19 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 1993 1517 101.5 — — — — -10 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 1822 128.5 — — — — -2 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.