H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Carling Bassett Seguso H2H: 0-2

Carling Bassett Seguso holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carling Bassett Seguso leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carling Bassett Seguso won the 1983 US Open round of 128 5-7 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Carling Bassett Seguso
CAN Age 59 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carling Bassett Seguso 5-7 6-1 6-3 Lea Antonoplis Match data Sep 1, 1983* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Carling Bassett Seguso 6-4 6-1 Lea Antonoplis Match data Feb 19, 1983* QF Hershey WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Carling Bassett Seguso — — — 2,011 149 102 59.4% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Carling Bassett Seguso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 1982 2–3 40.0% — 1,521 0 0
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 1983 35–21 62.5% — 1,833 0 1
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1984 37–20 64.9% — 1,941 0 1
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1985 30–17 63.8% — 1,881 0 1
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1986 18–12 60.0% — 1,847 0 1
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1987 16–12 57.1% — 1,832 0 2
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,770 0 2
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1989 3–4 42.9% — 1,756 0 2
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1990 3–3 50.0% — 1,761 0 2
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1992 1–3 25.0% — 1,729 0 2
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Carling Bassett Seguso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 56 38 94 59.6% 49 23 72 68.1% 21 17 38 55.3% 23 24 47 48.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Carling Bassett Seguso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 1982 1522 110.1 — — — — +59 — — 50.0% -0.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.22
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 1983 1833 140.5 — — — — -64 -80 -108 59.8% +0.66 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 110.3 +0.30
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 1984 1941 159.2 — — — — -36 -5 -187 63.0% +0.84 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -3.25
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1985 1881 145.4 — — — — +32 +23 -161 61.3% +0.77 7–5 (58%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 +2.10
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1986 1848 144.0 — — — — -1 +74 -76 56.9% +0.43 7–5 (58%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -1.30
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1987 1832 140.5 — — — — -35 +154 -85 57.1% +0.49 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 -0.67
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1988 1771 121.4 — — — — -28 — — 41.7% -0.08 0–2 0–2 — -1.12
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1989 1757 117.9 — — — — -30 — — 46.2% -0.77 1–0 0–1 — -0.78
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1990 1761 124.9 — — — — — +191 — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 — — -0.23
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1992 1730 109.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -1.67 1–0 — — -0.51
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 2011 151.0 — — — — -15 +28 -122 58.0% +0.54 38–30 (56%) 20–19 (51%) 102.7 -2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.