H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-3

Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 3–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1989 Australian Open round of 64 0-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan
SWE Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan 0-6 6-2 6-3 Lea Antonoplis #136 Match data Jan 20, 1989* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan 6-4 7-5 Lea Antonoplis #81 Match data Dec 14, 1984* R16 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan 6-2 6-3 Lea Antonoplis Match data May 25, 1983* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan — — — 1,989 261 192 57.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Catarina Lindqvist Ryan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,487 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1982 5–10 33.3% — 1,475 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1983 4–4 50.0% — 1,523 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1984 28–16 63.6% — 1,789 0 2
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1985 44–18 71.0% — 1,974 0 3
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1986 28–22 56.0% — 1,881 0 3
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1987 34–20 63.0% — 1,872 0 3
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1988 29–23 55.8% — 1,795 0 3
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1989 29–19 60.4% — 1,783 0 3
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1990 19–16 54.3% — 1,726 0 4
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1991 25–22 53.2% — 1,715 0 5
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1992 14–16 46.7% — 1,637 0 5
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Catarina Lindqvist Ryan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1984 18 4 22 81.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 17 5 22 77.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 14 5 19 73.7%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1986 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 9 18 50.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1987 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 12 5 17 70.6% 6 5 11 54.5%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 18 13 31 58.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1989 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 9 7 16 56.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 121 80 201 60.2% 38 41 79 48.1% 42 28 70 60.0% 55 39 94 58.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Catarina Lindqvist Ryan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 1979 1487 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.03
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1981 1488 105.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.19 0–2 2–0 — +0.21
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1982 1475 107.8 — — — — +48 +48 — 38.2% -1.03 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.48
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1983 1524 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 44.4% +0.06 2–0 0–1 — +0.40
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1984 1790 134.0 — — — — +46 -198 -179 61.8% +0.63 7–7 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 +0.87
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1985 1975 162.0 — — — — +82 -345 -300 67.9% +1.41 9–7 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 -1.46
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1986 1882 146.6 — — — — +39 -212 -145 53.9% +0.50 11–8 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 100.6 -0.51
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1987 1873 150.2 — — — — +27 -182 +26 60.2% +0.81 7–3 (70%) 8–2 (80%) 108.4 +0.96
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1988 1796 140.3 — — — — +23 -122 +73 53.3% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 97.1 -0.66
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1989 1784 144.8 — — — — -16 -119 +141 58.3% +0.58 10–9 (53%) 9–4 (69%) 101.1 -0.14
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1990 1726 134.9 — — — — +39 -38 +188 55.6% +0.40 4–7 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 95.7 +2.94
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1991 1715 132.5 — — — — +17 -28 +190 53.5% +0.22 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) 97.5 +3.85
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1992 1637 122.8 — — — — +57 — +258 44.4% -0.27 3–0 (100%) 4–1 (80%) 105.9 +2.19
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1990 146.8 — — — — +35 -131 -2 56.2% +0.47 69–62 (53%) 48–30 (62%) 107.5 +2.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.