H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Catherine Suire H2H: 0-1

Catherine Suire holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Suire leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Suire won the 1986 Houston round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Catherine Suire
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catherine Suire #84 3-6 6-4 6-3 Lea Antonoplis #99 Match data May 8, 1986* R32 Houston WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Catherine Suire #513 #52 13 1,672 79 129 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Catherine Suire
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1981 5–6 45.5% — 1,519 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,500 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1983 11–12 47.8% — 1,627 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1984 7–14 33.3% #115 1,605 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1985 6–11 35.3% #104 1,604 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1986 11–16 40.7% #84 1,581 0 0
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1987 8–11 42.1% #135 1,584 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1988 10–16 38.5% #124 1,588 0 0
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1989 6–11 35.3% #139 1,577 0 0
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1990 3–7 30.0% #189 1,546 0 0
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 1991 8–10 44.4% #115 1,592 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1992 3–10 23.1% #213 1,533 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #244 1,516 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Catherine Suire
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1986 6 6 12 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 31 45 76 40.8% 18 35 53 34.0% 20 29 49 40.8% 7 14 21 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Catherine Suire
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1980 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.31
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1981 1519 113.9 — — — — — +61 — 48.0% -0.12 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.38
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1982 1501 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.21
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1983 1628 116.8 — — — — -25 -84 +53 44.4% -0.13 6–2 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 104.7 +0.90
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1984 1605 119.5 — — — — -55 -6 +55 35.4% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -0.68
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1985 1604 117.1 — — — — -49 -21 +14 34.2% -1.29 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 -0.66
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1986 1581 108.8 — — — — -11 -33 +17 39.1% -0.69 7–5 (58%) 2–6 (25%) 98.7 +1.07
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1987 1584 113.3 — — — — -31 -2 — 43.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 +0.58
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1988 1588 119.2 — — — — +7 -54 -33 38.1% -0.76 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 103.7 -0.32
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1989 1577 115.4 — — — — +58 -84 -19 39.0% -1.41 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.19
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1990 1547 110.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.65
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1991 1592 120.8 — — — — -27 — +66 46.3% -0.32 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.09
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1534 103.0 — — — — -3 — +72 25.8% -1.68 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 100.9 -0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1516 103.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1672 120.0 — — — — -6 -24 +32 38.5% -0.86 39–32 (55%) 20–30 (40%) 101.6 +0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.