Lea Antonoplis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 26, 1981 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Vicki Nelson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 20, 1985 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Erika Smith H2H: 1-0
Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Erika Smith in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1980 Berkeley quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | 6-4 6-3 | Erika Smith | Match data | May 5, 1980* | QF | Berkeley | WTA 250 | — |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,770 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Erika Smith | — | — | — | 1,500 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lea Antonoplis | Erika Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,458 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,453 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,430 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Lea Antonoplis | Erika Smith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1973 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 45 | 72 | 117 | 38.5% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 48 | 50 | 98 | 49.0% | 12 | 34 | 46 | 26.1% | Career | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Lea Antonoplis | Erika Smith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1973 | 1579 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | +107 | — | — | 69.6% | +0.70 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +3.55 | 1980 | 1451 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31.6% | -1.16 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.36 |
| 1974 | 1532 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | +96 | — | +11 | 41.2% | -0.65 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +1.36 | 1981 | 1482 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.14 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 1975 | 1560 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +137 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.41 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.23 | 1982 | 1489 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | +0.22 |
| 1976 | 1610 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -28 | -16 | 48.0% | -0.16 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.98 | 1988 | 1477 | 93.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 |
| 1977 | 1652 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | — | -31 | 62.5% | +0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +1.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 1713 | 131.8 | — | — | — | — | -75 | — | +41 | 49.4% | -0.07 | 9–8 (53%) | 7–4 (64%) | 104.2 | +1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 1722 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -96 | — | +9 | 47.5% | -0.54 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–4 (67%) | 101.3 | -0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 1733 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | -109 | — | +62 | 63.3% | +0.80 | 4–3 (57%) | 0–3 (0%) | 98.4 | +1.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1717 | 116.5 | — | — | — | — | -101 | — | +95 | 43.2% | -0.91 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1632 | 114.6 | — | — | — | — | -131 | — | +169 | 37.7% | -1.00 | 2–7 (22%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.5 | +1.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1568 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | -36 | +18 | +127 | 32.6% | -1.30 | 3–2 (60%) | — | — | +0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1583 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | -40 | — | +93 | 41.9% | -0.67 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.4 | +2.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1571 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | — | +95 | 41.3% | -0.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.7 | +2.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1459 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | +163 | 26.3% | -1.26 | 0–6 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 90.9 | +0.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1412 | 91.7 | — | — | — | — | -6 | +46 | — | 34.5% | -1.00 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.6 | +1.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1454 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | -65 | — | +173 | 44.1% | -0.91 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.2 | +0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1447 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.58 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1431 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1771 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +2 | +77 | 44.2% | -0.49 | 43–60 (42%) | 33–39 (46%) | 95.8 | +6.46 | Career | 1500 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | -0.97 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +2.36 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Erika Smith
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Christine Calleja | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 3, 1988 | H2H |
| Tina Mochizuki | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 7, 1982 | H2H |
| Hannah Somerville | 1 | 0 | 1 | May 6, 1982 | H2H |
| Kate Latham | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 4, 1981 | H2H |
| Lynn Tholen | 1 | 0 | 1 | May 3, 1981 | H2H |