H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 3-0

Lea Antonoplis holds a 3–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lea Antonoplis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1988 Australian Open round of 64 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis #160 7-6(5) 6-3 Heather Ludloff #87 Match data Jan 15, 1988* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lea Antonoplis 7-5 6-0 Heather Ludloff Match data Nov 26, 1982* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Lea Antonoplis 6-4 5-7 6-4 Heather Ludloff Match data Jul 28, 1982* R64 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Heather Ludloff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,514 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Heather Ludloff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Heather Ludloff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.21
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1979 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1980 1465 105.1 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.22
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.27
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1982 1473 106.3 — — — — +70 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.83
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1983 1515 109.9 — — — — +14 — +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1984 1546 102.7 — — — — -41 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.91
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1985 1488 104.3 — — — — -35 — +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1987 1542 110.3 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1988 1504 112.8 — — — — -63 — +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1989 1468 103.4 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.53
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -99 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1576 110.5 — — — — -27 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.