H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 3-0

Lea Antonoplis holds a 3–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lea Antonoplis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1988 Australian Open round of 64 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis #160 7-6(5) 6-3 Heather Ludloff #87 Match data Jan 15, 1988* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lea Antonoplis 7-5 6-0 Heather Ludloff Match data Nov 26, 1982* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Lea Antonoplis 6-4 5-7 6-4 Heather Ludloff Match data Jul 28, 1982* R64 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Heather Ludloff — #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Heather Ludloff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,515 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,546 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1985 2–12 14.3% — 1,488 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Heather Ludloff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Heather Ludloff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.20
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1979 1484 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1980 1466 105.1 — — — — +54 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.20
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.26
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1982 1473 106.5 — — — — +71 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.81
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1983 1515 110.0 — — — — +15 — +44 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.11
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1984 1546 102.8 — — — — -40 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.98
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1985 1489 104.4 — — — — -36 — +73 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.45
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 1987 1542 110.5 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.7 +2.75
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 1988 1505 112.9 — — — — -64 — +64 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.34
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 1989 1468 103.5 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.48
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +68 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -98 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 1576 110.7 — — — — -26 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.