H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-1

Isabel Cueto holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabel Cueto leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1986 Tokyo Japan Open round of 32 6-3 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Isabel Cueto
GER Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabel Cueto #100 6-3 4-6 6-4 Lea Antonoplis #132 Match data Oct 16, 1986* R32 Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Isabel Cueto
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Isabel Cueto
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% — — — — — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Isabel Cueto
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 1984 1509 106.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.12
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 1985 1521 110.4 — — — — +17 +59 — 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1986 1539 121.5 — — — — -48 +97 — 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1987 1761 135.7 — — — — -187 +64 — 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1988 1826 141.4 — — — — -254 +103 — 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1989 1817 132.8 — — — — — +87 — 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1990 1799 139.4 — — — — -220 +80 — 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1991 1662 120.0 — — — — -82 +47 — 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1992 1591 97.8 — — — — -65 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.24
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1885 137.0 — — — — -131 +81 — 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.