H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Jenny Byrne H2H: 1-1

Lea Antonoplis and Jenny Byrne are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1985 Sydney International round of 64 2-6 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Jenny Byrne
AUS Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 2-6 7-6 6-3 Jenny Byrne #134 Match data Nov 20, 1985* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Jenny Byrne #134 4-6 7-5 6-2 Lea Antonoplis Match data Nov 13, 1985* R64 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jenny Byrne — #45 24 1,725 59 119 33.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Jenny Byrne
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1984 1–2 33.3% #141 1,488 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1985 4–7 36.4% #132 1,491 0 0
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1986 7–12 36.8% #107 1,527 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1987 6–15 28.6% #144 1,496 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1988 7–16 30.4% #119 1,503 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1989 14–16 46.7% #49 1,599 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1990 0–4 0.0% #546 1,552 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1992 11–18 37.9% #81 1,569 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 1993 5–14 26.3% #149 1,520 0 0
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 1994 4–12 25.0% #182 1,474 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #823 1,458 0 0
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Jenny Byrne
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1990 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 5 11 16 31.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1993 3 11 14 21.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 33 59 92 35.9% 10 29 39 25.6% 16 27 43 37.2% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Jenny Byrne
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 1983 1478 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.04
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1984 1489 102.3 — — — — — — +74 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.09
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1985 1492 109.9 — — — — — — +74 40.7% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.2 +0.86
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1986 1528 113.1 — — — — -17 +43 +66 43.2% -0.73 1–5 (17%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.80
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1987 1496 108.6 — — — — +17 +28 +26 32.7% -1.20 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — +0.20
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1988 1504 105.5 — — — — +4 -14 — 31.4% -1.33 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 101.0 +0.22
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1989 1599 142.8 — — — — +79 -152 -97 47.1% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 101.5 -0.35
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1990 1552 93.6 — — — — — -167 — 0.0% -3.88 — — — -0.33
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1992 1570 122.0 — — — — +29 -216 +70 40.9% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.44
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 1993 1520 102.3 — — — — -18 — +113 32.6% -1.30 1–4 (20%) — — +0.49
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 1994 1475 108.6 — — — — +17 — +134 32.4% -1.22 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.11
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 1995 1458 90.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.08
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 1726 118.8 — — — — +25 -48 +59 36.8% -1.00 18–33 (35%) 18–17 (51%) 98.5 +1.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.