H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Judy Erskine H2H: 2-0
Lea Antonoplis holds a 2–0 lead over Judy Erskine in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1980 Craiglockhart semifinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1980* | Craiglockhart | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Lea Antonoplis | 6-4 6-4 | Judy Erskine | Match data |
| Jul 14, 1979* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | QF | — | Lea Antonoplis | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Judy Erskine | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Judy Erskine | — | — | — | 1,538 | 12 | 13 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lea Antonoplis | Judy Erskine | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |