H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Karen Susman H2H: 1-0
Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Karen Susman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1976 US Open first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1976* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lea Antonoplis | 6-4 6-4 | Karen Susman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Karen Susman | — | — | — | 1,678 | 18 | 16 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lea Antonoplis | Karen Susman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |