H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 1-0
Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1984 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1984* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lea Antonoplis | 6-4 6-2 | Katerina Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Antonoplis | Katerina Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |