H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Katrina Adams H2H: 1-1

Lea Antonoplis and Katrina Adams are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Katrina Adams won the 1988 Key Biscayne round of 128 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Katrina Adams
USA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Katrina Adams #123 7-6 6-3 Lea Antonoplis #146 Match data Mar 15, 1988* R128 Key Biscayne Category 6 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lea Antonoplis #161 6-2 6-3 Katrina Adams #162 Match data Jan 27, 1988* R64 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Katrina Adams #625 #67 199 1,607 55 114 32.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Katrina Adams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1987 1–3 25.0% #167 1,484 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1988 10–15 40.0% #96 1,539 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1989 14–25 35.9% #84 1,573 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1990 1–11 8.3% #256 1,470 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1991 7–7 50.0% #91 1,571 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1992 6–15 28.6% #143 1,537 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1993 4–10 28.6% #184 1,531 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1994 2–7 22.2% #144 1,511 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1995 3–8 27.3% #116 1,507 0 0
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1996 7–10 41.2% #115 1,555 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1997 0–2 0.0% #278 1,524 0 0
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #625 1,515 0 0
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Katrina Adams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1988 6 7 13 46.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 8 12 20 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1992 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1993 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1995 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 34 51 85 40.0% 3 21 24 12.5% 13 20 33 39.4% 5 22 27 18.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Katrina Adams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1987 1485 104.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.25 — — — +0.42
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1988 1540 107.3 — — — — +17 -104 +79 41.1% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 104.1 +0.75
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1989 1573 119.5 — — — — +5 -143 +43 38.0% -0.89 9–7 (56%) 8–9 (47%) 105.7 +0.11
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1990 1471 103.4 — — — — -8 — +146 21.4% -1.64 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.7 +0.18
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1991 1572 124.7 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.76 5–1 (83%) 5–1 (83%) 110.6 +0.43
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1992 1538 111.1 — — — — +21 -145 +41 29.5% -1.59 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 +0.39
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1993 1531 120.1 — — — — -36 -85 +137 35.3% -1.24 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.7 -0.13
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1994 1512 124.6 — — — — +10 — — 30.4% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 100.9 -0.56
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1995 1508 111.9 — — — — +22 — — 30.8% -1.54 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.29
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1996 1555 119.5 — — — — +44 -140 +1 43.9% -0.63 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.18
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1997 1525 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1998 1515 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.10
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1607 121.2 — — — — +9 -122 +69 35.5% -1.08 27–31 (47%) 24–22 (52%) 107.7 +1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.