H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Kim Jones H2H: 2-0

Lea Antonoplis holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1984 Newport round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Kim Jones
USA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis #116 6-4 6-2 Kim Jones Match data Aug 2, 1984* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Lea Antonoplis 6-2 6-3 Kim Jones Match data Mar 10, 1982* R64 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.