H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-3

Lori Mcneil holds a 3–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1986 San Diego third round 6-3 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 1986* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Lori Mcneil #40 6-3 1-6 6-2 Lea Antonoplis #133 Match data
Apr 29, 1986* Indianapolis WTA 250 R64 Clay Lori Mcneil #77 7-5 6-2 Lea Antonoplis #99 Match data
Feb 21, 1985* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #85 6-3 7-6 Lea Antonoplis #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,774 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,559 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,626 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,665 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,717 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,724 0 1 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,735 0 2 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,719 0 2 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,572 0 2 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,460 0 2 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,413 0 2 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,455 0 2 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,448 0 2 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,432 0 2 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11