H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Louise Field H2H: 0-1

Louise Field holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Field leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1985 ASB Classic quarterfinal 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Louise Field
AUS Age 59 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Louise Field #148 7-5 6-0 Lea Antonoplis Match data Dec 14, 1985* QF ASB Classic WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Louise Field #752 #96 12 1,550 58 121 32.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Louise Field
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #248 1,485 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,517 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1986 4–10 28.6% #157 1,479 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1987 11–17 39.3% #113 1,453 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1988 4–13 23.5% #163 1,412 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1989 12–20 37.5% #100 1,542 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1990 9–17 34.6% #125 1,522 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1991 3–14 17.6% #193 1,435 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1992 5–9 35.7% #170 1,449 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1993 5–10 33.3% #175 1,470 0 0
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1994 1–3 25.0% #197 1,477 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Louise Field
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 8 13 21 38.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1991 3 10 13 23.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1993 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 31 61 92 33.7% 7 26 33 21.2% 17 24 41 41.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Louise Field
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 1982 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1984 1485 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.09
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1985 1518 115.3 — — — — — — +108 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.31
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1986 1480 96.1 — — — — +51 +34 — 26.7% -1.53 2–0 0–2 — +1.62
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1987 1453 103.6 — — — — +25 +36 +129 40.6% -0.91 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.5 +2.84
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1988 1413 105.2 — — — — +8 +55 +117 30.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 97.9 +1.10
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1989 1543 115.0 — — — — -45 -110 +60 38.9% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +0.30
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1990 1523 107.8 — — — — -25 -143 +110 41.9% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 1–1 — +1.49
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1991 1435 97.6 — — — — +9 -98 — 21.6% -1.87 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 94.3 +0.83
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1992 1449 98.4 — — — — +48 — — 38.9% -0.83 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 +1.27
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1993 1471 105.2 — — — — +12 — — 34.3% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.04
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1994 1477 88.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 0–1 — -0.23
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1551 106.4 — — — — +1 -13 +105 35.6% -1.07 22–33 (40%) 19–24 (44%) 96.1 +5.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.